A question worth sitting with
Can rich people go to heaven — is money evil?
A camel through the eye of a needle. A rich young ruler who walked away sad. Jesus had a lot to say about money — and almost none of it was comfortable.
Money itself is not the enemy. But what money does to the human heart is something Jesus took very seriously. The question may not be how much you have, but how tightly it holds you.
Let's start with what Jesus actually said — not what we've been told he said, not what the prosperity gospel preacher says he said, not what the cultural Christian memory has smoothed into something comfortable. The actual verse, in context, with the actual weight it carries:
Three Gospel writers included this line. That repetition was not accidental. Context matters here: Jesus says this right after a wealthy young man walks away from him because he will not give up his possessions. And the disciples' response tells us everything about how it landed: "When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and asked, 'Who then can be saved?'" Not mildly puzzled — astonished. Because in their world, wealth was widely understood to be a sign of God's favor. The rich man was blessed. The poor man was being judged. And here was their teacher saying that the most blessed among them faced the most difficulty getting in.
The camel and the needle — context
There is a popular teaching that "the eye of the needle" was a tiny gate in Jerusalem that camels could squeeze through if unloaded. It is a comforting interpretation. It is almost certainly wrong.
Historians and biblical scholars have found no solid evidence that such a gate existed in Jesus' time. The "needle gate" explanation appears to have originated in medieval commentary — invented, scholars believe, because people were uncomfortable with how radical the statement actually sounds. No archaeological record. No contemporary first-century source mentions it.
Most evidence points to Jesus deliberately using absurd hyperbole. A camel was the largest common animal in that region. The eye of a sewing needle was one of the smallest openings imaginable. Putting them together was meant to produce exactly the reaction the disciples had: astonished shock. In other words: humanly impossible. That was the point.
The very next verse confirms it — "With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible" (Matthew 19:26). He is not saying "rich people struggle a bit." He is saying this requires divine intervention. The gate interpretation drains the verse of exactly the force Jesus intended it to carry.
The camel can go through. Not because the needle is secretly wider than it looks. Because God is capable of what human self-sufficiency is not — including cracking open the shell that wealth tends to build around a human heart.
This verse still makes modern Christianity uncomfortable because it collides head-on with prosperity culture, celebrity religion, and the idea that material success equals spiritual blessing. Jesus talked about money more than most churches do now. And he was not subtle about the dangers of worshipping it. The prosperity gospel preacher who tells you God wants you wealthy is working very hard to avoid the camel. The camel is still there.
Ten categories of wealth — what Jesus said when he had more time
The rich young ruler is one encounter. But the Urantia papers preserve a longer teaching that Jesus gave to a wealthy Roman who came to him with a sincere question: if I truly want to be a good steward of my wealth, what do I actually do with it? Jesus laid out something remarkable — ten different ways wealth is accumulated, each requiring a different kind of moral accounting.
1. Inherited wealth. Riches from parents and ancestors. You are obligated to transmit legitimate wealth honestly across generations — but you are not obligated to perpetuate any dishonesty or injustice in how ancestors accumulated it. Inherited wealth stolen from others carries a moral debt that belongs to the heir, not just the thief.
2. Discovered wealth. Riches from natural resources. No individual permanently owns what the earth holds. The discoverer deserves reward, but not monopoly over blessings that belong to the whole of humanity.
3. Trade wealth. Fair profit from honest commerce. This is legitimate, and the honest trader should take the same profit they would gladly give a fellow trader in a similar transaction. Fairness is the measure, not the profit itself.
4. Unfair wealth. Riches from exploitation or enslavement. "No mortal who knows God and seeks to do the divine will can stoop to engage in the oppressions of wealth." Wealth derived from oppression is a moral curse. It should be restored to those from whom it was taken — or their descendants.
5. Interest wealth. Fair return on legitimate invested capital. This is acceptable — "first cleanse your capital, then lay claim to the interest." The moral status of the return depends entirely on the moral status of what generated it.
6. Genius wealth. Rewards of creativity and invention. The inventor owes something to ancestors, progeny, and society. The solution is not to deprive the genius of all reward — it is fairness.
7. Accidental wealth. Riches from luck, timing, or circumstance. What time and chance deliver should be regarded more as a trust for the group than as personal property.
8. Stolen wealth. Riches through fraud or dishonesty. "Make haste to restore all these ill-gotten gains to the rightful owners." This is not a suggestion. No amount of religious activity or charitable giving cleanses a fortune still built on theft.
9. Trust funds. Wealth held in trust for others. "The trusteeship of the wealth of one person for the benefit of others is a solemn and sacred responsibility." Take only what all honest people would consider fair.
10. Earned wealth. The direct fruit of your own honest labor. "If your work has been done in fairness and equity — this is truly your own." No one can challenge your right to hold and use wealth you genuinely earned through honest effort. This is the cleanest category — and even it comes with responsibility.
Jesus was not anti-money. He was anti-self-sufficiency. Anti-covetousness. Anti-the lie that the accumulation of material things can replace the relationship with God that actually sustains a human life.
The three questions that actually matter
When someone asked Jesus how the wealthy would stand in the day of judgment, he did not give a single yes or no. He gave three questions that he said all who acquire great wealth must answer:
One — How much wealth did you accumulate? Scale creates responsibility. A small surplus and an empire-scale fortune carry different moral weights.
Two — How did you get this wealth? Means are not separable from ends. You cannot cleanse an honest use from a dishonest source.
Three — How did you use your wealth? What you do with what you have is the ultimate test of what you actually value.
Jesus added something to the young man who came to him covetously seeking his inheritance: "My son, what shall it profit you if you gain the whole world and lose your own soul?" This is not rhetoric. It is the most practical financial calculation in the Gospels. What is the actual return on investment if the investment costs you the one thing no amount of money can replace?
The prosperity gospel — what it got wrong
They found the one place in scripture where giving leads to receiving — and built an empire on it.
The prosperity gospel — also called the Word of Faith movement, health-and-wealth theology, or seed-faith teaching — began in the 1950s with Oral Roberts, who coined the phrase "seed faith" and proclaimed that money donated to his ministry would return to the donor sevenfold. It was carried forward by Kenneth Hagin, Kenneth Copeland, Benny Hinn, Creflo Dollar, and others who together generated billions of dollars from their followers while living in private jets, 18,000-square-foot mansions, and luxury vehicles — all tax-exempt as religious organizations.
In 2007, the US Senate Finance Committee investigated six prominent televangelists — Copeland, Dollar, Joyce Meyer, Benny Hinn, Paula White, and Eddie Long — over the use of church funds for personal benefit. The investigation found no prosecutable wrongdoing. But what it revealed about the lifestyle of these ministries was more damning than any criminal charge.
The core theological claims of prosperity gospel are these: God wants you wealthy. Poverty is a consequence of sin or insufficient faith. Your financial gift to the ministry is a "seed" that God is contractually obligated to return multiplied. Speaking faith-filled words creates material reality. These claims are not minor variations on orthodox Christianity. They are a fundamentally different gospel — one in which God is essentially a vending machine for those with sufficient faith-currency to insert.
What makes this particularly damaging is not just the theology. It is the pastoral consequences. When a sick person gives everything they have to a prosperity preacher as "seed money" for healing — and dies — the teaching says they died because their faith was insufficient. The failure is always transferred to the believer. The preacher's plane is already paid for.
Jesus did promise that those who gave up houses, land, family, or income for the sake of the kingdom would receive a hundredfold return — but he said this return would include "persecutions" (Mark 10:30). The prosperity teachers quote the hundredfold. They leave out the persecutions. That is not a reading of the text. It is a misreading of it, for profit.
The prosperity gospel is the ghost cult wearing a suit. The God of the prosperity gospel is not the Father who runs to meet the prodigal. He is the genie who grants wishes to those with the right formula.
The beer question — does who receives it change whether you should give?
"What if they just use the money to buy beer?" — the question most of us have actually asked. This is the most honest question in the whole conversation about money and giving, and it deserves a real answer rather than a pious dodge. You see a person on the corner with a cardboard sign. You have a ten-dollar bill. And you think: what if they spend it on alcohol? What if they're not really homeless? What if giving actually hurts them? These are real concerns, not signs of a hard heart.
Jesus addressed giving to the undeserving directly. "He makes his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust." (Matthew 5:45). God does not restrict sunlight to people who will use it wisely. God does not give rain only to the virtuous farmer. The sun rises on people who will waste the day. The rain falls on people who will squander the harvest. The giving is not contingent on the worthiness of the receiver.
The Urantia framework adds something that helps here: "When in honest doubt about the equity and justice of material situations, let your decisions favor those who are in need, favor those who suffer the misfortune of undeserved hardships." Default toward generosity. Not because every recipient will use your gift wisely. Because generosity is what it does to you, not just to them. The giving changes the giver before it changes the recipient.
Practical wisdom has a place here too. If you are genuinely concerned about how cash will be used, give food instead. Offer to buy the meal directly. Give to an organization you trust that serves this population. But do not let the imperfect use of a gift by an imperfect person become the reason you never give at all. Jesus ate with people everyone else had deemed unworthy. He healed people who didn't even say thank you. He was not running a merit-based distribution system.
And honestly? If the person buys beer, they buy beer. You gave in love. That is between you and God. What they do with it is between them and God. You are not responsible for managing their choices — you are responsible for the posture of your own heart.
Money is energy — nothing more, nothing less
A dollar bill is a piece of paper. Its value is entirely agreed upon — a collective story we all tell together about what that paper is worth. Take it to a remote community that has no concept of currency and it is worth less than the food you might have bought with it. The paper itself is nothing. What we give it is everything.
Money is stored energy. It represents time already spent — hours of labor, creativity, skill, or risk already converted into a medium that can be exchanged for other forms of energy later. The green piece of paper in your wallet is the crystallized form of your past effort, waiting to become someone else's future. In that sense, what you spend money on is what you are saying your past effort was for.
And this is why the tight fist and the open hand produce such different lives. The person who hoards money is not storing energy — they are stopping its flow. The person who gives freely is not losing energy — they are participating in a circuit. Energy moves. It returns in forms you didn't expect, through pathways you didn't design. Generosity is a posture that opens you to receive as well as to give.
The Urantia papers say something that captures this: "Wealth is not a natural gift; it results from labor, knowledge, and organization." Money is not something that happens to you — it is something you participate in creating. And the stories you tell yourself about it — that there is not enough, that it is corrupting, that you do not deserve it, that having it makes you a bad person, or conversely that having it proves you are spiritually superior — all of those stories are the actual problem. Not the money itself.
The poverty consciousness and the wealth consciousness are both stories. Both can be wrong. The free person is the one who holds money lightly in both directions — neither clinging to it when they have it nor making its absence the story of who they are.
What Jesus was actually after
The Urantia papers record Jesus saying: "It is not a sin to have honorable wealth; but it is a sin if you convert the wealth of material possessions into treasures which may absorb your interests and divert your affections from devotion to the spiritual pursuits of the kingdom." There it is. Not: wealth is evil. Not: being poor is holy. Where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.
The rich young ruler walked away sad. He was not a bad person — Jesus looked at him and loved him (Mark 10:21). He was a sincere person who had kept the commandments and genuinely wanted to know what was missing. And Jesus told him: give away what you have, and follow me. The young man could not do it. Not because he was especially wicked but because his possessions had become, as Jesus saw immediately, the actual center of his life. They had taken the place that God was supposed to occupy.
Your servant. Or your master. There is no third option. Money takes one of those two roles in every human life, and the role it plays is determined not by how much of it you have but by where it sits in your interior hierarchy of value. A person with very little can be mastered by money — by the terror of its absence, the obsessive attention it requires, the identity of scarcity it enforces. A person with a great deal can hold it as a servant — as a tool, a trust, a means of serving others, a thing that comes and goes without touching the deeper ground of who they are.
Can rich people go to heaven? Yes. But not because they're rich. And the camel is still real.
The problem is not money. The problem is what money does to the human heart when it is allowed to occupy the center — when it becomes the measure of worth, the source of security, the answer to fear. The prosperity gospel preacher who asks you to send a seed offering for God's blessing has made money the center of the spiritual life and turned the Father into a transaction. Jesus spent his ministry dismantling exactly that arrangement.
The honest question — the one that actually matters — is not "how much do you have?" It is "who is in charge?" If you have very little and you hold it in terror and scarcity, money is your master. If you have a great deal and you hold it as a trust, using it generously for the people who need it, it is your servant. The heart posture is everything. The amount is almost beside the point.
Give. Not to the prosperity preacher who promises you a return. Give to the person in front of you who needs something you can supply. Give without requiring a receipt for the universe. Give because generosity is the posture of an open hand, and an open hand can receive as well as release. Give because the Father sends his rain on the just and the unjust alike — and you were made in his image.
Join the conversation
Comments & ideas
Have a thought, a question, or something this stirred up? Leave it below.
Loading comments…
Keep exploring